Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Food Microbiol ; 95: 103709, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-996891

ABSTRACT

The ongoing pandemic involving severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has raised the question whether this virus, which is known to be spread primarily though respiratory droplets, could be spread through the fecal-oral route or via contaminated food. In this article, we present a critical review of the literature exploring the potential foodborne transmission of several respiratory viruses including human coronaviruses, avian influenza virus (AVI), parainfluenza viruses, human respiratory syncytial virus, adenoviruses, rhinoviruses, and Nipah virus. Multiple lines of evidence, including documented expression of receptor proteins on gastrointestinal epithelial cells, in vivo viral replication in gastrointestinal epithelial cell lines, extended fecal shedding of respiratory viruses, and the ability to remain infectious in food environments for extended periods of time raises the theoretical ability of some human respiratory viruses, particularly human coronaviruses and AVI, to spread via food. However, to date, neither epidemiological data nor case reports of clear foodborne transmission of either viruses exist. Thus, foodborne transmission of human respiratory viruses remains only a theoretical possibility.


Subject(s)
Foodborne Diseases/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/transmission , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Animals , Birds , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , Feces/virology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
2.
Acad Med ; 95(11): 1634-1638, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-525754

ABSTRACT

When extreme events occur, some research becomes a clear priority, but what becomes of all other research? Does it stop indefinitely, or can it be paused with plans to resume, persist with modifications, or pivot to address new priorities? Facing this dilemma and witnessing it among their fellow health professions education researchers, the authors recognized a need for guidance. This Invited Commentary presents a framework, organized as key questions related to the research stage and process, to assist health professions education researchers in making decisions about how to proceed with research that was planned or in progress when an extreme event occurred. Although at the time of this writing, the COVID-19 pandemic was the extreme event at hand, the authors intentionally created questions and discussed considerations that can be helpful for thinking through decisions in a variety of disruptions in health professions education research-many of which require similar difficult decisions and creative solutions to carry important research forward and maintain high quality.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/standards , Coronavirus Infections , Education, Medical/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Research Personnel/psychology , Adult , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL